News
Current Issue
Archives
Health Services Directory
Personals
Blogs
Forums
Surveys
Calendar
Focus and Fact Sheets
Contact Us
Group Rates
Advertise

Are you currently covered by a health insurance plan?
Yes
No

   
Click here to discuss!
 
 
POZ.com
POZ Personals
POZ Mentor
POZ ASO Directory
AIDSmeds
Real Health
TuSalud.com
ComboCards
Rx Info Cards
 

 

October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
July 2005

emailrssprint


January 17, 2008

Weight-Loss Stories Differ in African-American Magazines

Are there drastic differences in health articles found in African-American magazines? Yes, says a new report from the University of Iowa. By analyzing the health content in three major African American women’s publications—Essence, Ebony and Jet—with three mainstream titles—Good Housekeeping, Better Homes and Garden and Ladies Home Journal—researchers found that although all six magazines suggested many similar weight-loss strategies, the mainstream glossies were twice as likely to suggest the following evidence-based strategies: incorporating more whole grains and proteins, portion control and eating low-fat foods. African-American glossies were more likely to suggest relying on religious faith and fad diets such as the Atkins diet and the South Beach diet.

They also noted that although three fourths of black women are believed to be overweight or obese, the number of weight-loss stories did not increase in Essence, Ebony or Jet from 2000-2004. Yet both magazine groups were criticized for focusing too much on individual responsibility (more than 83 percent of content) rather than examining environmental or economic factors that make weight loss difficult (7 percent). 

The study’s coauthor Stacy Campo stated, "Both genres are highly guilty of overreliance on individual strategies. We blame individuals too much for circumstances that are not entirely within their control. We know people living in unsafe neighborhoods are much less likely to exercise. And fast food is cheap compared to fresh fruit and vegetables. To tell a poor person that they made a bad choice because they couldn't afford the salad fixings raises some ethical concerns."

How do you feel about this study’s findings? Sound off in our forums.

emailrssprint

Scroll down to comment on this story.

Name:

(2-50 characters..)

Email:

(will not show)

City:

(optional)

Comment (500 characters left):

(Note: The Real Health team review all comments before they are posted. Please do not include either ":" or "@" in your comment.)

| Posting Rules

Previous Comments:

 


Username:

Password:


AlwaysAppropriate
Chicago
Illinois

Get Real Health's Newsletter

[ about Smart + Strong | about Real Health and Real Health Magazine ]

contact us | terms of use | your privacy | advertise | © 2008 Smart + Strong